7-Eleven Branding Fail: A reminder to promise, and deliver

Whether you realize it or not, you have a personal brand–the essence of how people see you–and that brand shapes the opportunities people give you and the trust they put in you.   Once in a great while, you will have a defining moment come along when you can get people’s attention and totally re-frame how they see you, for good or for ill.

That defining moment, in my  relationship with the 7-Eleven convenience store chain, came today: an email went around my office announcing that in honor of the date (7/11), 7-Eleven was giving out free Slurpees.  When I admitted to my colleagues that I hadn’t had a Slurpee for a long time, they acted shocked and professed to me their love for the product, even recommending which flavor I should get.  This was all working like clockwork so far–7-Eleven had taken an existing number floating in the public’s mind, made a free offer, and even got my friends to evangelize.

In other words, 7-Eleven had created the expectation that maybe even a health-food snob like me might find a 7-Eleven Slurpee delicious, and could overcome my usual dislike for chaotic little convenience stores.

But when I actually stepped into a 7-Eleven, all this opportunity was lost. I got no sense, from the signs in the store or the the harried workers ringing customers up, that this day was 7/11.  And I soon saw why: every single one of the eight or ten Slurpee flavors in three different machines was covered with a series of crudely hand-lettered signs reading “Out of Order.” 

Now, I don’t know if the Slurpee machines in this store had been out of order for days, or if they gave out under the volume served today.  But to me as a would-be customer, the effect was the same: the total disconnect between promise and delivery killed my appetite, and certainly 7-Eleven’s brand.  I put a pack of gum I had planned to buy back on the shelf and slunk out of the store, followed by several other sullen and thirsty-looking people.

My complaint isn’t primarily that 7-Eleven had slipped through the “while supplies last, at participating locations” loophole in their advertising–that’s totally understandable and needed.  The failure for their brand wasn’t only that they didn’t have drinks for everyone, it was that that their staff failed to want to have drinks for everyone–this location “wasn’t participating” even at the emotional level in trying to get better customers.  (Of course I blame management, not their busy employees).

So to the old saying “under-promise, over-deliver,” I offer an even simpler revision: Promise, and deliver.  Every time you create expectations and then give people the emotional payoff of seeing them fulfilled, you win.  But every time you create expectations and then fail to deliver the goods–or even worse, the emotional and relational promise underlying the goods–then you lose.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Independence Day: More than not having to pay for William and Kate’s wedding

After being out of the country last year, I’m glad to be back in Washington D.C.  again to celebrate July 4th.

Fireworks

Doing international work makes it all the more important to be anchored by my own  national identity and and recognize what America has given me, what I contribute in return, and how to explain my country to others, and a day like this brings all that into focus.

So what would I say to non-Americans about this day, other than it means I didn’t have to pay for William and Kate’s wedding? I love celebrating the United States because,  while we have a knack for flag-waving patriotism and self-regard (which  I was surprised to see some French friends admire as exceptional and valuable traits upon their first visit to the U.S. a few months ago), we also try to see the bigger picture, and love not just our landscapes or our ethnicities, but an ideal of individual liberty and a way of making it happen that is based on debate as well as loyalty.

In declaring independence,  the U.S. may not have abolished the self-interested posturing of patriotism,the “arbitrary veneration of real estate above principles,” as  George Jean Nathan put it, that is perhaps an inevitable side effect of nationhood–but the founders did succeed in moving the new Enlightenment principles higher on the list, and protected the self-interest of individual citizens, rather than the king or nobility or the religious class.  The founders were elites, but in demanding self-determination from England, they sowed the seeds of self-determination for far more marginalized people at home and abroad, as Gordon Wood implies. 

Just as importantly, the founders built mechanisms for improvement into the system, both in creating space for new laws and the freedom of expression needed for new ideas,  so that even those excluded can see our dream as their own, and call to “Let America be America Again“ or proclaim that “Democracy is Coming to the U.S.A.“  And as that Leonard Cohen song points out, we are inspired not only by our own history, but also reform movements abroad like the Tienanmen Square protests, even in countries where movements for democracy  haven’t found a place in local memory yet. 

That is what I’d like to celebrate: I am loyal to my country not because it’s perfect, but because it’s a part of me, a place whose imperfections and struggles, as well as its accomplishments, I share in and want to recognize as part of my heritage.

And for me it’s not enough to say about my country, as the film Lawrence of Arabia  put it, “[I'm loyal to] England. And to other things.” Our responsibility, in a country built on ideals, is to bring the two together–to do what we can to ensure that these “other things”–things we recognize as part of our ideals,  but not our actions–are manifest in who we are and what we do as citizens, even if, like T.E. Lawrence, we sometimes must struggle to accomplish this within challenging institutions.

And in my work on personal growth and international development, I want to help others experience that same sense of self-determination and responsibility in their own lives.  Because ultimately the most valuable thing any of our countries can do is create an environment where ordinary people can live great lives in pursuit of happiness.

Photo: Public Domain, U.S. Air Force.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Can you spot the overseas-born Chinese woman?

Monica Tan, an Austrailian-born, ethnically Chinese writer in Beijing, put together a  slideshow including herself alongside Chinese people, to test whether a stranger on the street can really guess her nationality.  As James Fallows notes , this is a great followup to the series Fallows wrote a few months ago titled “Walk Like an American,” about what mannerisms or other traits make expats stand out even when surrounded by ethnically and racially similar people.  “Other than BMI,” Fallows quips.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Father’s Day: What my Dad taught me about building bridges to make a difference

I think I originally learned bridge-building from my parents, and especially my father, who has a talent not only for finding what he has in common with others, but taking the next step to use that commonality to claim the voice and authority needed to make a difference.

I first noticed this at a young age–when traveling as a family in Mexico, our family had our ups and downs in dealing with cultural divides, but learned a lot along the way.  One day, we met some American motorcycle aficionados who intimidated me a little and seemed like the polar opposite of our van-driving suburban family.  So I was surprised when my Dad had no trouble striking up a conversation with them about his riding “little motorcycles” in the 1970s, which at that age was a side of him I hadn’t yet heard about.  Not long after that, my Dad was also able to use that same experience to be open with my brother and I about the motorcycle wrecks he, and people he knew, had back then, describing to us why he didn’t want us to take all the same kinds of risks he once did.

Much closer to home, I saw him do another kind of bridge-building. We lived in a subdivision on the edge of a half-neglected cattle pasture that became an extension of our back yard, where we flew kites and made camcorder movie spoofs. The gate into the field was sagging and choked with weeds. But it was part of our neighborhood, and the old farmer certainly needed it when drove in with with hay bales, or out with cattle bound for the slaughterhouse. 

One day, a cement mixer that had just finished pouring a new porch for our neighbor started backing toward that gate, and my Dad sprung into action.  He had worked his way up to a white-collar office job as a state highway engineer, and had a masters’ degree in the teaching of English, so he was very measured and well-spoken.  He had recently told me that people usually use expletives because they don’t know how to express themselves.  But this situation was different.  

He ran up to the driver, who was about to dump a load of leftover concrete on the weeds by the gate, and shouted, “What are you doing? You can’t dump that shit here!” The driver started making excuses about cleaning his mixer, but my Dad stood firm in representing our neighborhood–even this broken-down gate–as our turf.  And he did so within the context of authority and urgency that a cement man would understand.  Eventually the man sullenly relented: “OK,” he said, “I’ll just dump it back at our yard.”  In retrospect I realize my Dad must have dealt with many people like that when supervising highway projects or in his earlier days as a surveyor, but it was a side of his cultural and negotiation skills I had never seen before.

My father’s sense of investing in his own place and story, to meet people on their own terms while staying anchored to his own values, has influenced me in my own work, and freed me to find new resources hidden in my own story and communication style.   None of us are just one thing, and learning to access those different dimensions opens up all kinds of new possibilities.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Matt Damon in The Departed: The pick-up artist as networking genius

I give advice on developing professional relationships, not romantic ones (because I don’t teach anything, like brain surgery, in which I haven’t reached an exceptional level of mastery myself).  But lately I’ve been noticing the lessons that the strengths–and weaknesses–of how men approach women can teach us about networking.  Because of the different stakes and different etiquette, sometimes the lessons stand out more in this context.  

In this scene from The Departed, Matt Damon’s character goes from total stranger to tentative date in just over one minute, only briefly delaying his elevator ride (see my recent  post about a Harvard Business School tool to help you write an elevator pitch). 

Damon quickly demonstrates his own value and develops common ground for conversation despite having very little information about Vera Farmiga’s character and facing a strong defense from her.  As cocky as he may be (he’s pretty much a bad guy in the movie after all) he uses his know-it-all sense of humor to open up discussion, and signals his impressive job and somewhat-impressive enrollment in law school.  I’m not generally in favor of the “neg,” as pick-up artists call their formulaic dissing of women, but Damon’s approach works and is actually balanced in how he makes fun of her but also appreciates her.

 It’s the end of the conversation, though, that most people remember from this scene:  After Damon wins their round of verbal sparring, she offers him her card, and he says, “No, no it’s all right, I am a detective…I’ll find you…No sorry, just joking, I need the card…card helps.”  This sums up the power balance he’s tried to establish throughout the conversation, but also his appreciation for her that he would take the trouble to track her down.

If you’ve been to any big event in a city like DC, you know how much young people focus on “getting the card,” as if someone handing over their business card was the sign of their permission and desire for a continued relationship.  But as Keith Ferrazzi argues in Never Eat Alone, the most important thing isn’t for you to have a way to contact the person, but for them to remember you as a distinct person worth talking with.  And that is the key to Damon’s shtick–he is hardly concerned at all with “getting the card”–or even her name–but he is supremely concerned with demonstrating his own value, getting her interest, and negotiating the next step.  Too bad he works for the mob….

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Harvard Business School elevator pitch builder

The elevator pitch is an easy and important tool for telling your story to anyone.  I’ve found elevator-pitch practice to be one of the most helpful parts of the career training in my MBA program, and in turn it’s been a very helpful tool as I’ve worked with one of my coaching clients.   (Contact me if you’re ever interested in a trial coaching session).

You never know when you may need it ( such as yesterday, when a friend and mentor of mine, Atlas Corps founder Scott Beale, ran into star New York Times columnist Thomas Friedman on the street in DC–he had about six blocks to talk with him , but that’s another story.  Hoping Tom will write a column about Atlas Corps.)

But to get back on topic, now Harvard has a   handy tool for coming up with your own elevator pitch, so you’ll be ready when you run into Tom Friedman or anyone else who needs to hear your story:

(Thanks to my friend Peter Maldonado for sharing this).

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Superhero social networks

Samuel Arbesman describes research on what the science of social network analysis can tell us about comic book characters, and by extension, real life:

 
 The Marvel Universe does exhibit the statistical features of a real social network in some simple ways. Furthermore, similar to our own world, they found distinct differences between the social structures of good guys and bad guys. However, in some very important aspects, it’s actually the opposite of a real social network. Specifically, while in real social networks the popular people interact with the other popular people, this is not so in the Marvel universe. For example, Spider-Man and Captain America rarely come into contact.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Why is it easier to understand a fellow non-native speaker?

A British friend in Colombia once asked me about this.

There are some fascinating answers in a discussion between James Fallows and his readers. 

Apparently It’s called the the “mismatched interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit” by linguists  Tessa Bent and Ann Bradlow, here:

Results showed that for native English listeners, the native English talker was most intelligible. However, for non-native listeners, speech from a relatively high proficiency non-native talker from the same native language background was as intelligible as speech from a native talker, giving rise to the “matched interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit.” Furthermore, this interlanguage intelligibility benefit extended to the situation where the non-native talker and listeners came from different language backgrounds, giving rise to the “mismatched interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit.” These findings shed light on the nature of the talker-listener interaction during speech communication.

If all that terminology is any indication, I have a hunch that I will enjoy a similar benifit when discussing linguistics with those who, like me, are not native speakers of linguistics-ese.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Are your processes messing with your relationships?

Have you ever dropped the ball on connecting with someone you met because you didn’t have a good plan for how and when to follow up?  Or have you ever been frustrated when an overworked or disorganized HR department turns the hiring process into a stop-and-go, hurry-up-and-wait guessing game? Whether you’re on the giving or receiving end of the damage, you’ve probably seen it–all to often, our hearts are in the right place, but the process we follow with people sabotages our care for them.

The answer, first of all, is first, to stop taking people for granted–if you pay attention to the signals people are sending you, you will notice where you are hitting obstacles in connecting with them.

But second, you must also stop taking your processes for granted–depending on the situation, it’s easy to think of the ways you manage your connections with people as common sense, or social obligation, or bureaucratic mandate–but the fact is that even after accounting for these constraints, you have the power to fix the worst chokepoints in how you do things–you can rethink these processes in ways that serve people better, get you what you need more directly, and save everyone time and effort.  Common sense can be questioned.  Social obligations can be negotiated.  Bureaucratic mandates can be tweaked. 

The bottom line is that if you care about people, you will start to care about the rules and steps you use to connect with them.

And as a result, you will start making better rules and better processes.  Think of the potential value of even one more contact you are able to follow up with, of one more person you are able to serve, of one less hour you waste flipping through names before you get to the point.  Take the time to fix the process once instead of letting it damage your relationships over and over.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Since the world didn’t end this weekend…

Since the world didn’t end this weekend, I started thinking about escapism versus realism. 

The people preaching the end of the world on Saturday were being escapist–they were hoping that the complexities of life and spirituality would be all wrapped up and resolved before we even made it to Memorial Day Weekend!  When they heard a bout this prediction a few months or years ago, they confused whatever kind of urgency they felt with a promise of closure on that urgency, and now they’re having to pick up the pieces. 

It’s easy to laugh at them…and I did, when they came to my neighborhood.  But the tragic mess they have created for themselves should also remind us of our own vulnerabilities–escapism and the emotional draws of certainty and short-term thinking, which can affect how all of us make any life decision.

On Saturday morning, ironically, while some were counting down to the highly-advertised end of the world,  I was working on a spiritual project with a much longer time frame: The old church I’m involved with is looking back over its nearly two centuries of history in Washington D.C., and a team of volunteers is starting to prepare for a series of 200th anniversary-related projects and events, which won’t even start in a public way for a few years.

Spirituality and American culture both have a reputation for getting people caught up in the moment, forgetting the context of history and the humility it can bring, as shown so bizarrely on Saturday. But starting such a long-term project, I was struck by the potential of both spirituality and American culture to foster the opposite.   While some people were defining their lives in terms of what they hoped would happen on one day in May, here we were helping launch something that won’t even be starting in earnest for years–until after I’ve completed my current graduate work, and have already moved forward to any range of new enterprises and projects in my own life.  That, to me, seems like a much more promising manifestation of the forward-looking impulse in American faith and American culture.   

It is my hope that those of us who come from societies like the U.S. with a future time orientation can use it as a strength rather than as a weakness for ourselves and our world, not being rash, but instead inspiring people to not be limited by the past.  At the same time, I hope those of us with that tendency can learn from those inside and outside our culture who are more connected with history. 

And I hope the next time some American religious group plasters the world with billboards (if they must), they will have the decency to send a message with at least a little more of that long-term perspective and humility.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment